Discussion:
Truth copyright PL Olcott 1997 and 2024
(too old to reply)
olcott
2024-08-30 16:14:33 UTC
Permalink
Truth is merely the mapping from representations of actuality
to actuality itself. For the coherence theory this mapping is
from expressions of language to their meaning in this same
language. For the correspondence theory this mapping is from
sets of physical sensations to elements of the correct model
of the actual world.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.philosophy/c/g13n38LcCO0/m/7QGb7JXGn-4J
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
Python
2024-08-30 16:19:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by olcott
Truth is merely the mapping from representations of actuality
to actuality itself. For the coherence theory this mapping is
from expressions of language to their meaning in this same
language. For the correspondence theory this mapping is from
sets of physical sensations to elements of the correct model
of the actual world.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.philosophy/c/g13n38LcCO0/m/7QGb7JXGn-4J
So bullshit and nonsense can be copyrighted. Well... So what?
Mikko
2024-08-31 08:52:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Python
Post by olcott
Truth is merely the mapping from representations of actuality
to actuality itself. For the coherence theory this mapping is
from expressions of language to their meaning in this same
language. For the correspondence theory this mapping is from
sets of physical sensations to elements of the correct model
of the actual world.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.philosophy/c/g13n38LcCO0/m/7QGb7JXGn-4J
So bullshit and nonsense can be copyrighted.
Of course it can be. It is art, not science.
--
Mikko
Richard Damon
2024-08-30 18:18:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by olcott
Truth is merely the mapping from representations of actuality
to actuality itself. For the coherence theory this mapping is
from expressions of language to their meaning in this same
language. For the correspondence theory this mapping is from
sets of physical sensations to elements of the correct model
of the actual world.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.philosophy/c/g13n38LcCO0/m/7QGb7JXGn-4J
I other words, you are admitting that nothing you have been talking
about applies to FORMAL systems with their own specific definitions of
truth.

So, that just means that you are admitting to being a LIAR since mostof
the things you have been trying to apply your definition of truths are
such fields.
Richard Damon
2024-08-31 14:39:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by olcott
Truth is merely the mapping from representations of actuality
to actuality itself. For the coherence theory this mapping is
from expressions of language to their meaning in this same
language. For the correspondence theory this mapping is from
sets of physical sensations to elements of the correct model
of the actual world.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.philosophy/c/g13n38LcCO0/m/7QGb7JXGn-4J
Which shows your funny-mental error as you think you are "GOD",
something which has been proved incorrect.

Sorry, you have demonstrated that you have a fundamental and
funny-mental error in your logic that you are unable to see because you
THINK you are infallible, but that belief just proves your own error.
Loading...